Showcasing vintage male photography, mostly nude. You must be 18 years of age or older to visit this blog! If you hold a copyright on any material shown on this blog, notify me, and it will be removed immediately.
Followers
Saturday, November 18, 2023
Another side view
Our final stereo set features anothe side view and really shows the model thick hair.
If these haven’t been edited for posting here, they must have been intended for a stereo viewer other than the old standard viewers most people are familiar with; that is, the aspect ratio and margins look fairly different to me. Have you tried to view them in stereo? I don’t think merely printing them out would work in a stereopticon without manipulating them to fit a standard card. As for the one where the two sides are more different than usual, it is surprising how different such stereo views often are, while still working to present a 3D image in the stereo viewer.
You raise some good points. I also noticed the rather dramatic difference in that particular pair. I did not edit or crop them, and I got them off a website that is known for scanning old magazines without modification. Given that these are not, strictly speaking, magazine pages, the website's usual practices may not have been used.
.jpg)
Awesome.
ReplyDeleteTruly interesting. A handsome, well-built male. Thanks, Jerry. Oh, did FKK ever picture males with hard ons? Just curious.
ReplyDeleteNot that I've ever seen. I think that was a nein-nein.
DeleteIf these haven’t been edited for posting here, they must have been intended for a stereo viewer other than the old standard viewers most people are familiar with; that is, the aspect ratio and margins look fairly different to me. Have you tried to view them in stereo? I don’t think merely printing them out would work in a stereopticon without manipulating them to fit a standard card.
ReplyDeleteAs for the one where the two sides are more different than usual, it is surprising how different such stereo views often are, while still working to present a 3D image in the stereo viewer.
You raise some good points. I also noticed the rather dramatic difference in that particular pair. I did not edit or crop them, and I got them off a website that is known for scanning old magazines without modification. Given that these are not, strictly speaking, magazine pages, the website's usual practices may not have been used.
Delete