Showcasing vintage male photography, mostly nude. You must be 18 years of age or older to visit this blog! If you hold a copyright on any material shown on this blog, notify me, and it will be removed immediately.
Followers
Sunday, May 22, 2022
More Davinci
The male form is quite well presented in this Davinci drawing,
I don't know if Davinci's drawings of the packages were meant to be direct portrayals of the models or were intended to be some sort of ideal. It might be that the one with the "Classical" type was a study for a classically themed art work and not an anatomical reference, hence the difference.
At least this male's penis is less classical than the poor devil in that earlier drawing.
ReplyDeleteI don't know if Davinci's drawings of the packages were meant to be direct portrayals of the models or were intended to be some sort of ideal. It might be that the one with the "Classical" type was a study for a classically themed art work and not an anatomical reference, hence the difference.
Delete