Showcasing vintage male photography, mostly nude. You must be 18 years of age or older to visit this blog! If you hold a copyright on any material shown on this blog, notify me, and it will be removed immediately.
Followers
Saturday, April 13, 2019
This may be the same young man sprawled on an army blanket in one of today's earlier photos.
Note the other guy standing on the rock promontory in the background.
Oui, c'est le même que sur la couverture militaire. Il a vu l'homme qui le regardait, mais remet-il son slip ou l'enlève-t-il pour faire plaisir au voyeur? Là est toute la question !!! Est-il un grand vilain garçon provocant ou un petit pudique qui n'aime pas montrer son petit trésor poilu? ;-) ******************************* Yes, it's the same as on the military cover. He saw the man who was watching him, but he puts on his panties or takes it off to please the voyeur? Here is all the question !!! Is he a big naughty provocative boy or a little bashful who does not like to show his little hairy treasure? ;-)
The guy on an army blanket is very similar. 90% is he. As a photographer, forced him to undress and pose. For money? Previously, such photos were illegal. And again in the photo no sharpness is not the color. :( Not! Better black and white photo at 1950-th.
Oui, c'est le même que sur la couverture militaire. Il a vu l'homme qui le regardait, mais remet-il son slip ou l'enlève-t-il pour faire plaisir au voyeur? Là est toute la question !!! Est-il un grand vilain garçon provocant ou un petit pudique qui n'aime pas montrer son petit trésor poilu? ;-)
ReplyDelete*******************************
Yes, it's the same as on the military cover. He saw the man who was watching him, but he puts on his panties or takes it off to please the voyeur? Here is all the question !!! Is he a big naughty provocative boy or a little bashful who does not like to show his little hairy treasure? ;-)
Probably a soldier posed for money. Money is needed for beer! :)
DeleteThe guy on an army blanket is very similar. 90% is he. As a photographer, forced him to undress and pose. For money? Previously, such photos were illegal.
ReplyDeleteAnd again in the photo no sharpness is not the color. :(
Not! Better black and white photo at 1950-th.
I agree that the sharpness leaves a lot to be desired, and yes, it seems to be the same model.
Delete