Followers

Thursday, July 22, 2021

Uncertain


I have no photographer attribution for this photo, 
and I'm not even 100% positive that it's Bob Jackson.
It did, however, come from a usually impeccable source, fwiw.

 

8 comments:

  1. His grin looks forced. But his great body is more visible as is his male gear, which is impressive. A bit aroused, maybe?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I really don’t think that’s Bob. The head shape looks different.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see exactly what you mean. Even the best sources can be wrong sometimes.

      Delete
  3. Pretty sure this isn't Bob Jackson. The hair is wrong, Jackson never parted his hair (same haircut in every photo I've ever seen of him) The nipples are noticeably different, this guy's are smaller, darker, and flatter. Plus this guy has larger "junk" and it hangs differently.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I checked this model's pics on http://malemodelsvintagebeefcake.blogspot.com, where this pic was identified as Bob Jackson. What I noticed is that, in some pics, Jackson seems to have blond or dirty-blond hair. While in other pics, his hair is noticeably darker. I even see this in your posts today -- in your last pic of him, his hair seems almost black, as opposed to your 1st pic. Is this just a lighting thing? Or maybe the blonder hair pics were taken when he was much younger?

    In the Vintage Beefcake post, the above pic is one of four in that day's post, and there is a 5th of the back of one pic, which clearly ID's him as Jackson. Unfortunately, it is not clear if the back pic goes with the preceding image or the one that follows, altho all of them are labled as Bob Jackson.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I noticed the difference in hair color, too, and that isn't uncommon in these sorts of photos for the reason you mention, plus some of them used bleach. I'm becoming more convinced that this is not Bob. See Greggy's comment above.

      Delete