Showcasing vintage male photography, mostly nude. You must be 18 years of age or older to visit this blog! If you hold a copyright on any material shown on this blog, notify me, and it will be removed immediately.
I have checked out Bob Stevens' briefs and cannot tell whether they were intended as underwear, bathers or simply demonstration trunks. As bathers or demonstration trunks, they would have been quite brief and racy for '57. As for underwear, not so much so, because young blades were wearing really quite adventurous underwear beneath their pleated trousers, suits and jeans.
I have checked out Bob Stevens' briefs and cannot tell whether they were intended as underwear, bathers or simply demonstration trunks. As bathers or demonstration trunks, they would have been quite brief and racy for '57. As for underwear, not so much so, because young blades were wearing really quite adventurous underwear beneath their pleated trousers, suits and jeans.
ReplyDeleteI don't think they were intended be worn in view.
DeleteYou can just catch a glimpse of his scrotum in that gap. How did he get away with that?
ReplyDeleteIt's not really clear what it is, plus Bruce kept his magazines legal.
DeleteHe really fills the briefs/underwear/bathers/whatever very well...
ReplyDeleteYes, he does.
Delete